It's funny, but I haven't actually read The Lord of the Rings for more than a decade now. I've started to read it several times, and gotten through the prologue, which I quite enjoy. But somehow, I'm either in the mood for some lore or for a story, and I never get any further. Or maybe it's that I didn't like my copy.
But my brother-in-law is finally reading the books for the first time, and so I decided: all right, here it is. And so I started . . .
At Chapter 1. Having skipped the Prologue.
Old Obsessions Are Still Possessions (to quote my sister):
Travesty, I know. Or maybe I know and you don't, so let me give my credentials.
I was in middle school when the first movie came out, and so I read the books first, which set me up to dislike the movies. Ii started out my time on the internet on tolkienonline, where I was, for the first and last time in my life, a Big Deal on a forum and story-based website. People recognized my username. I wrote a popular (and very ridiculous) fan fiction and collaborated on a larger story with many others. I read and commented on Every Single Story that was posted. It was my place, my home . . . until it started changing (it has a new name now and is unrecognizable) and I fell off. But still, it was my first online-based obsession.
And on top of that, I have played The Lord of the Rings Online MMORPG since beta. And that game is made by the most obsessive fans who have ever obsessed. I'm not kidding when I say I know obscure lore and have the maps imprinted on my brain.
And yet . . . and yet . . . I've only read the Silmarillion all the way through once, The Children of Hurin Twice, The Tolkien Reader four or five times . . . and I've never read the histories. I memorized some words in the Black Speech but hardly any of the geneologies and only two of Tolkien's poems. Which I know some would say makes me a fake fan. :)
Starting Without the Prologue
So anyway, I did the unthinkable and skipped the Prologue. I'm now about 100 pages in; we're just reaching Woodhall. And I love it. I love that cold start, right into some magnificent storytelling. (And somehow, through all the slogging through histories, I forgot that Tolkien is just a really good, compelling writer with a lot of sly wit and frankly easy prose.) Beyond that, reading is so refreshing. It says to me: "This. This is what truly good writing looks like. This is what no-question-but-it's-five-stars writing looks like. How have you forgotten?" But it seems, reading it, that there were several details I forgot -- even as, on a deeper level, far more details spring to memory.
Thinking of Fellowship as having been published much later than The Hobbit
If I'd grown up having obsessed over the Hobbit, it would've been devastating to me to see Bilbo so old. I did read The Hobbit first (or my fifth grade teacher read it aloud), but only two years before; and though I liked it, I wasn't madly in love with it. But imagine if I had loved Bilbo so deeply, only to see him so old, so tired . . .
But as is, for me, The Lord of the Rings stands out more; and so I see The Hobbit more as a prequel; and so I am not sad to see old Bilbo but happy to see young Bilbo when I read that book.
It's Just a Start
As I said, I'm only 20% of the way into the first book. I've barely dipped my toe in. And yet, how striking . . .
I'll post further if I have further reflections.