Writing The Midnight Files has had some interesting effects on the way I view stories.
For those of you who aren’t familiar
with it, the basic premise of The Midnight Files is that story genres
invade the real world, changing how it functions to match story
conventions. To set the world right, the
Agency sends in agents who kill or unravel the story, often by using its own
conventions against it. Or, to put it
another way: The Midnight Files is basically TVtropes.com mashed with Supernatural
with guest stars from every popular novel/movie/videogame.
One of the things the Agency does to help its agents defeat story genres is by categorizing them into not only genre but strain, type, subtype, and variant. (Genres are described as “infecting” the real world, so I use some infection vocabulary.)
For example, in Agency parlance:
The Haunting of Hill House: Horror genre, House strain (Decadent variant), Malevolent type
Five Nights at Freddy’s: Horror genre, Rules strain, Survive-One-Night type (Multiple Nights variant), Animatronic subtype
Sherlock Holmes: Mystery genre, Private Detective strain (Impersonal variant), Deductive type
Labyrinth: Fantasy genre, Coming-of-Age strain, Fairytale type, Challenge subtype
I try to create these categories based on what is most impactful to the nature of how the story plays out, based on patterns I see when related to other stories. For example, in horror, location often defines a story’s tropes more than the villain: a horror ghost story that takes place in a house will more similar to a cursed mirror story that takes place in a house than it will be to a ghost story that takes place somewhere other than a house.
Part of the effect of breaking down story tropes in this manner is that sometimes I realize that stories I thought of as fairly different are actually fairly similar. At the moment, I’m writing a Gothic Horror in the style of Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, and I noticed two things:
1. Gothic Horror and Gothic Romance that take place in an Ancestral Estate are more similar to each other than they are to other types of Gothic in either genre.
2. Jekyll and Hyde is basically the same story as The Picture of Dorian Grey, except for the differences caused by the characters of the protagonists.
I address the first point somewhat in the story, so I’ll tackle the second here, because I think it’s, well, interesting.
First of all, I would categorize both stories as: Horror genre, Gothic strain, Duality type.
Jekyll and Hyde: a man with secretly decadent habits makes a drug to cure his boredom. This drug makes him transform into an evil version of himself. The evil version is happier than the kind version and intrigues the kind version. In fact, the kind version realizes he’d be happier if he stayed as the evil version permanently. However, when he realizes the evil version is actually going to become permanent, the kind version repents and kills himself rather than let the evil permanently take hold.
Dorian Grey: a man,
previously innocent, discovers the pleasure of decadent habits and indulges his
evil side more and more. A portrait of
him transfers the effects of his evil onto itself, allowing him to dodge the effects
of his evil. At once point, he realizes
that he has become evil, but decides he likes it too much to give it up and
decides to keep it permanently. When he
sees the evidence of his evil in the portrait, he tries to get rid of the
evidence by stabbing it, which ends up killing him instead.
If I were to create a template for a generic version of these stories, it would look like this:
In a Gothic Horror style:
The detailed categories of each would end up looking like this:
Jekyll and Hyde: Horror
genre, Gothic strain, Duality type (moral variant), transformation subtype
Dorian Grey: Horror genre,
Gothic strain, Duality type (immoral variant), magical object subtype
Overall, Jekyll and Hyde would be not much changed if it utilized a magical portrait instead of a scientific potion, and Dorian Grey would not be much changed if Dorian physically transformed. More important is the fact that Dorian, was at heart, a really horrible person through and through, and Jekyll had some redeeming qualities. Despite this, for years I have thought of the two stories as quite different, not because of the nature of the protagonists, but because of the sort of magic/science used to effect the plot. Which is, I suppose, a lesson more on the importance of window dressing than on anything else . . .
In any case, if looking at and
breaking down stories like this helps you at all, I recommend giving it a
try! It isn’t perfect by any means, but
it can be both useful and fun if your brain works that way.